63 sources·Politics

Washington Post's Controversial Non-Endorsement Sparks Internal Upheaval

The Washington Post's decision to refrain from endorsing candidates has triggered significant backlash among staff and raised questions about editorial independence.

27%

37%

The distribution of story sources: left-leaning (blue), center (light gray), and right-leaning (red).

Mostly Reliable

The underlying sources are generally reliable but sometimes include opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.

Balanced

The underlying sources are either a balanced mix of left and right or primarily centrist.

Subscribe to unlock this story

We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!

Get Started

No highlights available for this story.

Updated: Oct 26th, 2024, 12:56 PM ET

Summary

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

The Washington Post's announcement to not endorse candidates this election has ignited a revolt among staff, with many labeling the move cowardice. A draft endorsement for Kamala Harris existed but was halted by owner Jeff Bezos, sparking criticism and subscription cancellations. Nine columnists have publicly condemned the decision, asserting it undermines democracy. The Post's editorial direction is complex amidst a noted decline in readership and revenues, prompting calls for a return to neutrality in journalism. Internal debates on the role of media and endorsement practices continue to unfold as the election nears.

Perspectives

Compare opinions on this story from liberal (Left), conservative (Right) or center-leaning news organizations.

No center-leaning sources available for this story.

History

A summary of how this story has evolved over the last 24 hours.