Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Tennessee's Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors
Oral arguments in Supreme Court case U.S. v. Skrmetti discuss Tennessee's law prohibiting gender-affirming care for minors amid protests and expert testimonies.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedNo highlights available for this story.
Summary
In U.S. v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is reviewing Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors, with implications for sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause. Discussions reveal a conservative inclination to uphold the law, which prohibits treatments found beneficial for gender dysphoria and raises concerns over civil rights protections for transgender youth. Protests occurred outside the court, featuring speeches from supporters advocating for access to gender-affirming care. The Biden administration argues this ban constitutes sex discrimination, while experts warn of potential mental health impacts on transgender minors as the court's decision could influence similar laws across the country.
Perspectives
No center-leaning sources available for this story.
History
- 4M
- 4M
- 4M