Daniel Penny Acquitted in Jordan Neely Chokehold Case: Controversial Defense Strategies Highlight Racial Dynamics
Former Marine Daniel Penny was acquitted of manslaughter in Jordan Neely's chokehold death, raising concerns over racial bias in legal defenses.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedNo highlights available for this story.
Summary
Daniel Penny was acquitted of manslaughter charges in the death of Jordan Neely, following a defense that emphasized Neely's race and medical history. Critics argue the case reflects systemic racism in legal proceedings and raises questions about self-defense laws. Penny's lawyers are now considering a lawsuit against DA Alvin Bragg for alleged malicious prosecution. Legal experts predict challenges for Neely’s father's civil lawsuit against Penny due to lack of relationship and jury findings in the criminal trial. The acquittal has sparked polarized responses regarding racial dynamics in the interpretation of justice in high-profile cases.
Perspectives
No center-leaning sources available for this story.