U.S. Intelligence Reviews 'Havana Syndrome', Finds No Direct Evidence of Foreign Involvement

New assessment by U.S. intelligence concludes foreign adversaries unlikely behind 'Havana syndrome' ailments, but two agencies express possible connection to weapon development.

50%

This story was covered by 4 sources. This shows the distribution of these sources: left-leaning (blue), center (gray), and right-leaning (red).

Politics

Mostly Reliable

The underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.

Balanced

Summary

A summary of the key points of this story, verified by multiple sources.

A new report from U.S. intelligence has reaffirmed previous conclusions that there is no evidence linking a foreign power to the mysterious 'Havana syndrome' injuries. However, two agencies suggest a possible link to the development of a weapon by a foreign adversary. While five out of seven agencies maintain it's unlikely any foreign nation is involved, the report highlights the need for further investigation and research into the unexplained medical symptoms experienced by U.S. diplomats and government personnel.

Informed by:

From the Right

A recap of the main views or arguments shared by right-leaning sources.

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that it is very unlikely foreign powers are responsible for the mysterious 'Havana syndrome' injuries.
Some agencies suggest a possibility that a foreign adversary has developed a weapon that can cause these injuries, but express low confidence in this assessment.
The Biden administration is under pressure to investigate the incidents more thoroughly, with statements emphasizing ongoing and critical research into the matter.

Informed by:

Highlights (4)

Excerpts from the underlying articles that best reflect each outlet's unique perspective on this story.

While the bulk of the report stands behind a 2023 ODNI assessment finding no evidence a foreign adversary was behind the attack, the update comes on the heels of a GOP report from a House Intelligence subcommittee concluding it was likely a foreign power was behind the attacks.
2 spy agencies float possibility of foreign weapon behind ‘Havana syndrome,’ but most find no links
The Hill
Reliable
The underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.
·Center
The new findings released Friday represent a “shift in key judgments by some intelligence components” that demonstrates the need for additional investigation.
US finds no link between ‘Havana syndrome’ and foreign power, but two spy agencies say it’s possible
Boston Herald
Mostly Reliable
The underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.
·Leans Right
The new findings released Friday represent a "shift in key judgements by some intelligence components" that demonstrates the need for additional investigation, National Security Council spokesperson Sean Savett said in a statement emailed to reporters.
US finds no link between 'Havana syndrome' and foreign power, but two spy agencies say it's possible
Associated Press
Reliable
The underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.
·Center
The new findings released Friday represent a “shift in key judgements by some intelligence components” that demonstrates the need for additional investigation.
US Finds No Link between 'Havana Syndrome' and Foreign Power, but Two Spy Agencies Say It's Possible
Newsmax
Mixed Reliable
The underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.
·Right