Federal Judge Blocks EPA from Terminating $14 Billion in Climate Grants
A federal judge has stopped the EPA from ending $14 billion in Biden-era climate grants, citing insufficient evidence of fraud.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get Started
The judge also blocked Citibank, which holds the money on behalf of EPA, from transferring it to the government or anyone else.
FOX News·1M·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from terminating grants that were part of a $20 billion climate funding program created by the previous administration.
Judge Temporarily Blocks EPA From Canceling Climate Grants
Epoch Times·1M·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
Summary
U.S. District Judge Tonya Chutkan blocked the EPA from terminating $14 billion in grants awarded to Climate United and others, ruling that the Agency's allegations of fraud were vague. The grants, part of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, aim to support clean energy projects. The judge's ruling preserves the grants as ongoing litigation unfolds, with beneficiaries arguing they faced imminent harm without access to the funds. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin maintained that there were mismanagement and conflicts of interest, while grant recipients stated no evidence of wrongdoing had been presented.
Perspectives
A federal judge ruled that the EPA's termination of $14 billion in climate grants lacked sufficient evidence, supporting the claim of the grant recipients against allegations of fraud and mismanagement.
The judge highlighted that the EPA did not provide concrete details about the fraud claims, which were described as vague and unsubstantiated, ensuring that the grants remain intact while the case proceeds.
The court ruling preserves the status quo for the grant recipients, allowing them to continue their projects aimed at promoting clean energy and job creation.