Ohio Court Declares Gender-Affirming Care Ban for Minors Unconstitutional
A court ruling blocks Ohio's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, vowing an immediate appeal by the state attorney general.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedOhio lawmakers stood their ground on the bill, easily overriding his veto — making Ohio the 23rd state to ban gender-affirming health care for trans youth.
Appeals court blocks Ohio’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors | Politics
CNN·1M
·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.Ohio lawmakers stood their ground on the bill, easily overriding his veto — making Ohio the 23rd state to ban gender-affirming health care for trans youth.
Appeals court blocks Ohio’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors
Boston Herald·1M
·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.Ohio lawmakers stood their ground on the bill, easily overriding his veto — making Ohio the 23rd state to ban gender-affirming health care for trans youth.
Appeals court blocks Ohio's ban on gender-affirming care for minors
Associated Press·1M
·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Summary
The 10th District Court of Appeals ruled Ohio's ban on gender-affirming care for minors unconstitutional, citing discrimination and parental rights. The Attorney General announced an appeal, continuing the legal battle over H.B. 68, which also prohibits trans women and girls from competing in female sports. This decision follows a statewide veto by Governor Mike DeWine, who acknowledged the importance of healthcare for minors with gender dysphoria. The ACLU celebrated the ruling, emphasizing the need for families to support their children in accessing vital healthcare.
Perspectives
The court's decision to block Ohio's ban on gender-affirming care rests on the belief that it discriminates against transgender youth and interferes with parental rights over healthcare decisions.
The ruling reflects a growing concern that legislative actions could unjustly limit access to critical health services for transgender minors, raising questions about bodily autonomy and parental decision-making.
Despite the governor's veto and the court's ruling, the political climate around gender-affirming care in Ohio remains contentious, suggesting further legal challenges lie ahead.