Waltz Accepts Responsibility in Signal Chat Scandal Amid National Security Concerns
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz acknowledges responsibility for including a journalist in a sensitive military discussion, igniting issues of security protocol.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get Started
The use of Signal, rather than a secure government platform, to discuss classified military plans sparked widespread criticism, with some experts saying it may have violated the Espionage Act.
Donald Trump reveals how Signal group chat leak happened
Newsweek·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The revelation has sent shockwaves through Washington, prompting a lawsuit and questions about why high-ranking officials discussed such sensitive matters on a potentially vulnerable civilian app.
Mike Waltz takes 'full responsibility' for Signal group chat leak
BBC News·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The Signal chat has been panned as a massive breach of national security, and many have noted that senior officials are not supposed to discuss detailed military plans outside special secure facilities or protected government communications networks.
Hegseth fends off reporter’s questions about Signal chat leak: 'I know exactly what I'm doing'
FOX News·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
The big picture: President Trump made clear he does not plan to fire Waltz for establishing the Signal group and inadvertently adding Atlantic magazine editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to it, telling Newsmax on Tuesday night he believed a "lower level" employee who works for his national security adviser had added the journalist's number.
Axios·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The episode has sparked widespread backlash and ridicule.
Mike Waltz claims ‘full responsibility’ for Signal chat group leaked to journalist
The Guardian·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
Inadvertently inviting a reporter to an encrypted chat raises serious questions about the security protocols that should be in place.
'It's embarrassing': Trump national security adviser Waltz takes responsibility for war plan leak
USA TODAY·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Unfortunately, it is clear that this administration cares more about imposing their radical political agenda and lining the pockets of their billionaire buddies, than it does about protecting the American taxpayer and our national security.
House Democrat: Hegseth shared classified info to make up for ‘personal inadequacies’
The Hill·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
It’s bizarre.
Susan Rice: Trump Administration Group Chat 'Biggest National Security Debacle'
Breitbart News·25d·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
Waltz described the incident as “embarrassing” — but vowed that the White House would “get to the bottom of it.”
New York Post·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
This was, to say the least, an extraordinary security breach caused by uncommon recklessness at the tippy-top of the national defense hierarchy.
A Rare Moment of Bipartisan Disbelief
The Atlantic·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
Waltz's refutation gives a glimpse of what appears to be a larger Trump administration strategy around the leaks.
"Making up lies": Waltz response reveals Trump admin strategy on Yemen leaks
Salon·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.The muted Republican reaction both in Florida and among many lawmakers nationally reflects how incidents that may have once sparked bipartisan outrage are only dismissed as hiccups as Trump stands firm backed by his allies and supporters.
Republicans in Mike Waltz's old district aren't mad at him or Trump over Yemen Signal chat
Associated Press·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
I know how to use it, hence they should not be using it at the highest levels of the U.S. government.
CNN’s Elie Honig Breaks Down Why Prosecuting Trump Admin Signal Leak Could Be ‘Tricky’
Daily Caller·25d·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.While acknowledging the incident "still should've never happened," Mullin said it was not a matter of national security and called for moving on.
Sen. Mullin to : Signal Chat Leak 'Blown Out of Proportion'
Newsmax·25d·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
For the moment, however, critics of the Trump regime at home and around the world are again in awe of the incompetence that has repeatedly made a laughingstock of his inner circle.
Trump Team's War Plans Group Chat Triggers Avalanche of Memes
Rolling Stone·25d·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.
But his defiant tone may have just backed his administration into a corner of litigious federal investigations, potentially giving one of his most prominent and influential critics a major win.
Trump Just Handed His Biggest Enemy in Media a Slam Dunk
MEDIAite·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
The situation raises concerns about the effectiveness of current communication tools used by government officials.
Trump says Waltz should not apologize for Signal group chat scandal
Washington Examiner·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
Military operations — especially those about to occur — are highly sensitive U.S. secrets, which can put service members and American intelligence methods at risk.
White House, DOD deny that Hegseth leaked military secrets in chat app
Military Times·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Summary
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz has taken full responsibility for mistakenly adding Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal chat that discussed military plans for Yemen. Despite President Trump downplaying the incident and stating no classified information was shared, Democrats and some Republicans are demanding an investigation into what’s deemed a significant breach of protocol. Waltz noted it was an embarrassing mistake, stating, 'I built the group,' and denied staff involvement. Experts criticize the use of an unclassified app for discussing military strategies, warning it violates record-keeping laws.
Perspectives
There are serious concerns about the use of the Signal app by top officials for discussing military plans, including potential breaches of national security protocols.
While the White House denies any classified information was shared, lawmakers from both parties are calling for more transparency and accountability regarding the incident.
The successful outcome of the military operation complicates the conversation, as some defense leaders push back against the seriousness of the leaked information.
FAQs
History
- 25d
- 25d
- 25d