Trump Administration Defends Signal Chat Amid Leak Controversy, Detailed Attack Plans Revealed
The Atlantic released a Signal chat revealing sensitive discussions on military strikes against Houthi militants, raising concerns about classified information.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get Started
The information shared in the chat were clearly classified as they were about an operation that hadn’t occurred yet.
MEDIAite·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared.
The Atlantic publishes full Signal thread with Hegseth, Waltz after Trump says texts not classified
CNBC·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
What was revealed was jaw-dropping in its specificity and includes the type of information that is kept to a very close hold to protect the operational security of a military strike.
The Atlantic releases the entire Signal chat showing Hegseth's detailed attack plans against Houthis
PBS NewsHour·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
Warner and other senators questioned Tulsi Gabbard, director of national intelligence, and CIA director John Ratcliffe about the group chat that discussed war plans for upcoming military strikes in Yemen.
The Guardian·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared.
The Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemen
NBC News·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared.
Mother Jones·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.
The disclosure follows two intense days during which leaders of President Donald Trump's intelligence and defense agencies have struggled to explain how details that current and former U.S. officials have said would have been classified wound up on an unclassified Signal chat that included Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg.
The Atlantic Releases Signal Messages Showing Attack Plans
TIME Magazine·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
The report rattled Washington, and fears around national security rose in its wake.
Hegseth on Signal controversy: ‘I know exactly what I’m doing’
The Hill·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.The disclosure follows two intense days during which Trump’s senior most Cabinet members of his intelligence and defense agencies have struggled to explain how details that current and former U.S. officials have said would have been classified wound up on an unclassified Signal chat that included Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg.
The Atlantic releases the entire Signal chat showing Hegseth's detailed attack plans against Houthis
Associated Press·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The substance of the chat is very interesting, however, and provides a telling insight into the workings of the Trump inner circle.
The most chilling lesson of Signalgate
Salon·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.
This hearing comes one day after the committee’s Senate equivalent grilled the leaders over the group chat leak.
Live: Intelligence officials face House following heated Senate hearing
NewsNation·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The attempts by President Donald Trump and top leaders of his administration to downplay a security breach that revealed military strike plans in a Signal group chat including a journalist stand in stark contrast to their reaction to Hillary Clinton’s use of a home server as secretary of state.
In their own words: Trump officials shrugging off Signal leak once decried Clinton's server
Boston Globe·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared.
Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal
The Atlantic·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
Still, it sparked debate over whether the nation’s most powerful government officials should communicate sensitive military information on a non-government platform.
Trump team's Signal snafu sparks debate over secure comms: 'Russia and China are listening'
FOX News·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.This entire story was another hoax written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin.
Leavitt: Goldberg Reveal Exposes His War Plans 'Hoax'
Newsmax·25d·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
And it was clarifying because it showed Trump officials’ eagerness to evade questions in the face of accountability.
Gabbard and Ratcliffe offer unbelievable spin in response to Trump admin’s Signal scandal
MSNBC·25d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.
The CIA director indicated the use of the app is standard practice.
CIA director denies classified info was on Houthi strike group chat
Straight Arrow News·25d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.This pattern of an amazing cavalier attitude towards classified information is reckless, sloppy.
Business Insider·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
It was clear throughout that the pair had spun themselves into a tangle of contradictions, at one point Ranking Member Mark Warner (D-Va.) called out the notion that 'somehow, well, none of this was classified, but we can’t talk about it here.'
Dems Slam Trump Intel Chiefs to Their Faces Over Group-Chat Fiasco
Rolling Stone·1M·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.
This sloppiness, this incompetence, this disrespect for our intelligence agencies and the personnel who work for them is entirely unacceptable.
New York Post·1M·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
Critics of the Trump Administration are arguing that Goldberg's access to the group was a major blunder from a national security standpoint.
AlterNet·1M·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.
Summary
During a recent Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, DNI Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe defended use of Signal for secure military communications despite new disclosures from The Atlantic. The magazine published a chat where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared precise details about airborne attacks on Houthi militants in Yemen just before they occurred. Critics, including lawmakers, argue the chat contained classified information, while Trump officials insist otherwise. Amid calls for accountability, President Trump and his administration downplayed the significance of these communications, framing The Atlantic's reporting as sensationalist.
Perspectives
Criticism of national security officials in the Trump Administration arose following a mishap where sensitive military discussions were leaked via a group chat on Signal, a platform not considered secure for classified information.
Senators, particularly Democrats, expressed concern over the 'sloppy' nature of the incident, calling for resignations and emphasizing the need for accountability in national security matters.
Officials, including Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe, asserted that no classified information was shared despite containing sensitive operational details regarding military strikes.
FAQs
No FAQs available for this story.
History
- 25d
- 25d