Susan Smith Denied Parole After 30 Years for Murdering Sons

Susan Smith's parole hearing concludes with a unanimous denial following emotional testimonies from her ex-husband and the prosecutor.

11 hours ago

This story was last updated 11 hours ago

Reliable

The underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.

Balanced

The underlying sources for this story represent either centrist views or a mix of views across the political spectrum.
This story was covered by 12 articles. The graph below shows the distribution of these articles: left-leaning (blue), center (white), and right-leaning (red).

12 articles

Summary

Susan Smith, convicted of drowning her sons in 1994, was denied parole after an emotional hearing where her remorse was expressed but deemed insufficient. Testimonies against her release emphasized the heinous nature of her crime and the lasting impact on her family's lives.

Sources:

Left Perspective

  • Susan Smith's actions, resulting in the deaths of her children, are viewed as unequivocally heinous and deserving of her continued imprisonment. There is strong opposition to her potential release from both victims' families and the public, with letters overwhelmingly expressing disapproval of her parole.

  • Many view Susan Smith as manipulative, indicated by her efforts to gain media sympathy during the initial investigation by fabricating a story about her car being stolen. Her actions have served as a cautionary tale about the lengths to which individuals may go to seek attention and evade responsibility.

  • The parole process is seen as flawed and unjust, particularly in this case, where Smith's past behavior and lack of genuine remorse point towards a likelihood of reoffending. The sentiment is that parole should be reserved for individuals who demonstrate true rehabilitation, which Smith has not done.

Sources:

Right Perspective

No right-leaning sources available for this story.