US Vetoes UN Resolution for Gaza Ceasefire Amid Criticism from Global Leaders
The US vetoed a UN Security Council ceasefire resolution for Gaza, prompting international outcry amid escalating humanitarian crises in the region.
8 hours ago
Mostly Reliable
Balanced
14 articles
Summary
The US has vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, citing the need to link a ceasefire to the release of hostages held by Hamas. The resolution was supported by 14 of the 15 council members, but faced opposition from the US, which has now used its veto power four times during the ongoing conflict. Critics, including ambassadors from France and China, condemned the veto as neglecting the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where aid access is severely limited amid escalating casualties. The conflict has resulted in significant loss of life on both sides.
Sources:
Left Perspective
The US vetoed a UN Security Council resolution for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, ignoring the grave humanitarian crisis that has led to more than 44,000 Palestinian deaths.
Deputy US Ambassador Robert Wood's justification for the veto reflects a failure to acknowledge Israel's actions against civilians, as it prioritizes military objectives over peace and humanitarian needs.
The veto has been condemned by global leaders and rights advocates, who argue that it allows Israel to continue its military operations with impunity, while Palestinian lives are treated as lesser in the face of hostage negotiations.
Sources:
Right Perspective
The US vetoed the UN resolution to prevent legitimizing Hamas and to emphasize the need for the immediate release of hostages held by the group, rather than adopting a resolution that could empower terrorism.
Ambassador Robert Wood strongly criticized the resolution for failing to condemn Hamas and for its aim to create a ceasefire without addressing the hostage situation, asserting that it would embolden the group.
The US's commitment to Israel's security was reaffirmed, rejecting any measures that could allow Hamas to retain power, contrary to the proposal which was seen as siding with a terrorist organization.
Sources: