What specific products is Lululemon accusing Costco of copying?

Lululemon is accusing Costco's Kirkland brand of selling knockoff versions of specific products such as the Scuba hoodies, Define jackets, and ABC pants.

What legal actions is Lululemon seeking against Costco?

Lululemon is seeking monetary damages, a jury trial, and an injunction to stop the sale of the alleged counterfeit products.

How does Lululemon claim that Costco’s sales of these products affect consumers?

Lululemon claims that Costco and its manufacturing partners do not clarify their relationship to consumers, potentially misleading some into believing the knockoff items are made by Lululemon.

Has Lululemon been involved in similar legal disputes before?

Yes, Lululemon has previously been involved in legal conflicts over product duplication, including a notable dispute with Peloton in 2021 that later resulted in a partnership.

What is the broader significance of this lawsuit between Lululemon and Costco?

The lawsuit highlights ongoing concerns about protecting intellectual property rights and brand reputation against unauthorized sales and counterfeit products in the retail market.

5 sources

•

6M ago

Lululemon Sues Costco Over Alleged Knockoff Apparel

Lululemon has filed a lawsuit against Costco for selling unauthorized products that infringe on its trademark and design rights, seeking damages and a jury trial.

L 20%

C 60%

R 20%

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

Lululemon has initiated legal action against Costco in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

The lawsuit claims Costco's Kirkland brand is selling apparel that closely resembles Lululemon's designs.

Lululemon is seeking monetary damages and a jury trial to halt the sale of these alleged knockoff products.

The company emphasizes the importance of protecting its intellectual property rights against unauthorized sales.

This legal move highlights ongoing concerns over brand reputation and the impact of counterfeit products in the retail market.

Written using shared reports from

5 sources

Report issue

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources frame the Lululemon lawsuit against Costco as a significant legal battle over intellectual property rights. They emphasize Lululemon's perspective on protecting its brand integrity and reputation, while implicitly suggesting a bias towards supporting established brands against perceived infringement by larger retailers. The tone reflects concern for brand authenticity.

How we categorize media bias

Articles (5)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Sort By

Center (3)

Lululemon files lawsuit against Costco, claims company selling 'dupes' of products

ABC News•6M ago

Lululemon sues Costco over selling alleged dupes

NBC News•6M ago

In a lawsuit, Lululemon accuses Costco of selling knockoffs of the athleisure brand

NPR•6M ago

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

: Lululemon is accusing Costco's Kirkland brand of selling knockoff versions of specific products such as the Scuba hoodies, Define jackets, and ABC pants.
Sources:
Axios
: Lululemon is seeking monetary damages, a jury trial, and an injunction to stop the sale of the alleged counterfeit products.
Sources:
Live Now Fox
: Lululemon claims that Costco and its manufacturing partners do not clarify their relationship to consumers, potentially misleading some into believing the knockoff items are made by Lululemon.
Sources:
Axios
: Yes, Lululemon has previously been involved in legal conflicts over product duplication, including a notable dispute with Peloton in 2021 that later resulted in a partnership.
Sources:
Live Now Fox
: The lawsuit highlights ongoing concerns about protecting intellectual property rights and brand reputation against unauthorized sales and counterfeit products in the retail market.
Sources:
Axios

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

This story does not have any previous versions.