15

Articles

14

Sources

40%

Analysis & opinion

The reporting

A neutral summary of the key facts most outlets agree on, drawn from reporting across the political spectrum.

A federal trial against Meta began Aug. 18 in Oakland, California, where 29 state attorneys general accuse the company of designing Facebook and Instagram to addict children and misrepresenting youth-safety risks. The states are pursuing civil penalties and restitution under state consumer-protection laws and the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, while Meta has denied the claims and estimated potential penalties could reach $1.4 trillion. Former Meta engineering director Arturo Béjar testified that Instagram used a “don’t ask, don’t tell” approach to users under 13 and prioritized growth over safety.

Analysis & opinion

The arguments that emerged from this coverage — built only from the analysis and opinion pieces, never from straight reporting. Each dot is one article, placed by its outlet's bias — left to right. How to read our graphics →
angles sorted left-argued → right-argued
·

Meta LiabilityLeans Right

Meta knowingly put profits ahead of children’s safety and helped fuel addiction and youth mental health harms. The lawsuits against the company are a justified reckoning for conduct it should have addressed long ago.

New York Post
Patriot Post

Get tomorrow's edition

Every side, every morning — free in your inbox.

More of today's stories

all of today's stories →