Why did the BBC label Bob Vylan as 'high risk' before the Glastonbury performance?

The BBC labeled Bob Vylan as 'high risk' due to concerns about potentially controversial statements during their live performance, which ultimately led to a need for reviewing live broadcast protocols.

What controversial statements did Bob Vylan make during the Glastonbury performance?

During the Glastonbury performance, Bob Vylan led the crowd in a chant of 'Death to the IDF' and made remarks about working for a 'f***ing Zionist,' sparking significant backlash.

What was the BBC's response to the backlash from Bob Vylan's performance?

The BBC expressed regret for not cutting the live broadcast, called it an 'error of judgement,' apologized to the Jewish community, and committed to improving accountability and revising live broadcast protocols.

What consequences did Bob Vylan face after the controversial Glastonbury performance?

Following the controversy, Bob Vylan was banned from performing in the U.S. as their visas were revoked, and British police began examining videos of the incident for potential criminal violations.

How has the Glastonbury festival organizer responded to the incident?

Emily Eavis, co-organizer of Glastonbury, condemned the chants as crossing a line, reiterated that there is no place for antisemitism, hate speech, or incitement to violence at the festival, and reminded production teams to enforce this standard.

3 sources

•

6M ago

BBC Faces Backlash Over Bob Vylan's Controversial Glastonbury Performance

The BBC has apologized for its handling of Bob Vylan's performance at Glastonbury, which included controversial statements, leading to a reevaluation of live broadcast protocols.

L 33%

C 67%

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

The BBC labeled Bob Vylan as 'high risk' prior to their Glastonbury performance, prompting a review of similar future live events.

During the performance, Bob Vylan led a controversial chant and made remarks about working for a 'f***ing Zionist'.

The BBC expressed regret for not pulling the live feed, calling it an 'error of judgement' and apologizing to the Jewish community.

In response to the backlash, the BBC acknowledged failures in their live broadcast protocols and committed to improving accountability.

The incident has raised concerns about compliance risks during live broadcasts and the need for real-time mitigation strategies.

Written using shared reports from

3 sources

Report issue

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources frame the incident as a significant misstep by the BBC, highlighting their regret and acknowledgment of protocol failures. The emphasis on accountability and apologies, particularly to the Jewish community, suggests a bias towards sensitivity in reporting controversial performances, reflecting a broader concern for public perception and community relations.

How we categorize media bias

Articles (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Sort By

Center (2)

BBC deemed Bob Vylan 'high risk' before Glastonbury

BBC News•6M ago

BBC Admits Bob Vylan Were Deemed “High Risk” Before Glastonbury & Apologizes To The Jewish Community

Deadline•6M ago

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

: The BBC labeled Bob Vylan as 'high risk' due to concerns about potentially controversial statements during their live performance, which ultimately led to a need for reviewing live broadcast protocols.
Sources:
Time
: During the Glastonbury performance, Bob Vylan led the crowd in a chant of 'Death to the IDF' and made remarks about working for a 'f***ing Zionist,' sparking significant backlash.
Sources:
Time
: The BBC expressed regret for not cutting the live broadcast, called it an 'error of judgement,' apologized to the Jewish community, and committed to improving accountability and revising live broadcast protocols.
Sources:
Time
: Following the controversy, Bob Vylan was banned from performing in the U.S. as their visas were revoked, and British police began examining videos of the incident for potential criminal violations.
Sources:
Time
: Emily Eavis, co-organizer of Glastonbury, condemned the chants as crossing a line, reiterated that there is no place for antisemitism, hate speech, or incitement to violence at the festival, and reminded production teams to enforce this standard.
Sources:
Time

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

This story does not have any previous versions.