What specific types of cancer are the plaintiffs alleging were caused by asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder?

The plaintiffs allege that the asbestos-contaminated talcum powder caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma[1].

What evidence do the plaintiffs claim shows Johnson & Johnson was aware of asbestos contamination in their talc products?

The plaintiffs refer to internal research, mine reports, and existing scientific literature, asserting that these sources would have informed Johnson & Johnson about asbestos contamination in their talc[1].

How does Johnson & Johnson or its former subsidiary Kenvue respond to the allegations?

Kenvue, previously part of Johnson & Johnson, states that the talc used in their baby powder complied with regulations, did not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer[1].

Who is considered legally liable in the current UK lawsuit—Johnson & Johnson, its subsidiaries, or both?

The lawsuit seeks to hold both Johnson & Johnson and its current and former subsidiaries, including Kenvue UK, liable for the alleged harm[1].

3 sources

•

2M ago

Johnson & Johnson Faces UK Lawsuit Over Alleged Asbestos in Talcum Powder

Over 3,000 UK individuals are suing Johnson & Johnson, alleging its talcum powder contained carcinogenic asbestos, causing cancer. The company allegedly knew for decades, removing the product globally in 2023.

L 33%

C 33%

R 33%

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

Thousands of people in the United Kingdom are jointly suing Johnson & Johnson, claiming its baby powder was contaminated with carcinogenic asbestos.

Over 3,000 plaintiffs allege that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused them to develop cancer and other serious diseases.

The lawsuit contends Johnson & Johnson allegedly knew about the carcinogenic fibers in their talc products for over fifty years.

Johnson & Johnson globally removed its talc-based baby powder from shelves in 2023, following numerous allegations and legal actions.

Legal inquiries are now directed to Kenvue, Johnson & Johnson's former consumer health business, regarding liability for the alleged harm.

Written using shared reports from

3 sources

Report issue

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally, presenting the serious allegations against Johnson & Johnson regarding asbestos in talcum powder and the company's strong denials. They provide historical context of legal battles and regulatory actions, attributing all claims and counter-claims to their respective sources, thus avoiding editorial bias in their reporting.

How we categorize media bias

Sources (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Sort By

Center (1)

Johnson & Johnson faces claim by 3,000 in U.K. who say asbestos in talcum powder made them sick

CBS News•2M ago

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

: The plaintiffs allege that the asbestos-contaminated talcum powder caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma[1].
Sources:
ITV News
: The plaintiffs refer to internal research, mine reports, and existing scientific literature, asserting that these sources would have informed Johnson & Johnson about asbestos contamination in their talc[1].
Sources:
ITV News
: Kenvue, previously part of Johnson & Johnson, states that the talc used in their baby powder complied with regulations, did not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer[1].
Sources:
ITV News
: Johnson & Johnson globally removed its talc-based baby powder from shelves in 2023 following numerous allegations and legal actions[1].
Sources:
ITV News
: The lawsuit seeks to hold both Johnson & Johnson and its current and former subsidiaries, including Kenvue UK, liable for the alleged harm[1].
Sources:
ITV News

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

This story does not have any previous versions.