Cornel West's Supreme Court Bid Fails: Pennsylvania Ballot Struggle Continues
Cornel West's appeal to be included on Pennsylvania's presidential ballot was denied by the Supreme Court, impacting his ability to campaign effectively.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $3/month or $30/year, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedNo highlights available for this story.
Summary
Independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s appeal to feature on Pennsylvania’s ballot was declined by the Supreme Court. Justice Samuel Alito’s refusal follows a lower court ruling citing procedural failures in West's nomination. The decision occurs close to Election Day, complicating West’s campaign as he argues that Pennsylvania's regulations hinder ballot access for minors. His legal team claimed this restriction violates First Amendment rights, while opposition courts maintained that changes so close to elections risk voter confusion. The ruling accentuates broader concerns about third-party candidates' visibility in key battleground states.
Perspectives
This story is either non-partisan or does not have the required sources to create partisan perspectives.