Jack Smith's Final Report on Trump Unveils Potential Convictions for Election Interference
The report details Trump's falsehoods and challenges faced by prosecutors, concluding constitutional principles barred his prosecution after re-election.
Politics
Mostly Reliable
Summary
Special Counsel Jack Smith's report outlines sufficient evidence for multiple felony convictions against Trump for election interference had he not been re-elected in 2024. The 137-page document, submitted to the DOJ, detailed Trump's spread of false claims about the 2020 election and his attempts to obstruct democracy. Smith's prosecution faced challenges, including Trump's influence on social media threatening witnesses. Ultimately, the report concludes that constitutional principles prevented the indictment of a sitting president. Trump's response labels Smith's actions as politically motivated, claiming innocence following his election victory.
Informed by:
From the Left
A newly released report by special counsel Jack Smith highlights that Donald Trump would likely have faced conviction for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election if he hadn't won the 2024 election, raising serious concerns about the implications of such actions on democratic integrity and accountability.
The report emphasizes the need for a transparent legal process, asserting that Trump’s claims of self-exoneration due to his electoral win do not erase the documented efforts to disrupt the electoral process and manipulate officials.
Smith's conclusions reflect the critical need to examine the relationship between political power and legal accountability, stressing that the complexities of Trump’s legal issues resist simple narratives and demand rigorous legal scrutiny.
Informed by:
From the Right
The release of Smith’s report has triggered skepticism regarding the true motives of the Justice Department, perceived as politically charged against Trump, suggesting that the findings serve to undermine public confidence in the electoral process rather than uphold justice.
Despite Trump's electoral victory, Smith's insistence that there was sufficient evidence for conviction raises questions about the fairness of the investigation and the interpretation of presidential immunity, hinting at potential overreach by the justice system.
Trump's criticisms of Smith highlight a broader disdain for what is perceived as lawfare orchestrated against political adversaries, emphasizing that the timing and manner of the report's release cater more to partisan narratives than to objective justice.
Informed by:
Highlights (35)
The release of half of the DOJ's report on Trump's investigations underscores a significant point: while Trump may evade prosecution due to his status, the need for accountability and the rule of law remains a pressing issue.
Special counsel stands by decision to prosecute Trump
World News Group
·Leans RightThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
Despite attempts by Trump's legal team, the release of Jack Smith's report lays bare the serious accusations against him, revealing just how precarious his position is as he approaches another presidential inauguration.
Donald Trump suffers final legal blow before inauguration
Newsweek
·CenterThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The bitter legal back-and-forth underscores the Trump team's relentless efforts to frame Jack Smith's report as nothing more than a politically motivated attack, despite the damning conclusions that could significantly impact Trump's future.
MEDIAite
·Leans LeftThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The reality of the situation is that Trump’s attempts to spin the findings are not only incoherent but also illustrate a desperate refusal to accept accountability for his actions.
Trump pushes incoherent response to Jack Smith’s report on election case
MSNBC
·LeftThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The report paints a stark picture of Trump's desperate attempts to cling to power, revealing not only his brazen disregard for the rule of law but also the alarming lengths to which he was willing to go to overturn a legitimate election.
The Report on Trump's 2020 Election Subversion Is Damning
Rolling Stone
·LeftThe underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.Mixed Reliable
Smith's assertion that his investigations would have led to a conviction underscores the critical need for accountability in our electoral processes.
READ: Special counsel’s final report in Trump Jan. 6 case
The Hill
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The ongoing struggles surrounding election integrity and the recent California wildfires underscore the pressing need for focused, decisive action in the face of multifaceted challenges.
Special counsel defends Trump indictment in report. And, Israel-Hamas ceasefire nears
NPR
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The investigation into Trump's actions during the 2020 election reveals a troubling disregard for the truth and a systematic effort to undermine democratic processes, underscoring the importance of accountability in leadership.
Trump would have been convicted if Jan. 6 case went to trial: Special counsel
Straight Arrow News
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
Special counsel Jack Smith's report highlights the alarming extent of Donald Trump's deceitful actions surrounding the 2020 election, emphasizing that his efforts to cling to power were not only unlawful but a direct threat to democracy.
Jack Smith: Evidence could have convicted Trump in Jan. 6 case
NewsNation
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The release of Jack Smith's report at such an odd hour seems to reflect a desperate attempt to undermine Trump's standing, further fueling the former president's claims of a politically motivated investigation.
Trump calls Jack Smith 'desperate' after special counsel report is released after midnight
FOX News
·Leans RightThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The final report by the special counsel underscores that Donald Trump's actions to retain power were not only criminal but also indicative of a dangerous disregard for democratic norms, revealing the depths of his attempts to subvert the will of the electorate.
'Political hacks and thugs: Trump fumes as Jack Smith report details 'criminal efforts'
AlterNet
·LeftThe underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.Mixed Reliable
The special counsel's persistent belief in the strength of his case against Trump highlights a profound discontent with the apparent inability to hold a president accountable for actions that threaten the democratic fabric of the nation.
Jack Smith, in a Defiant Final Report, Insists That He Could Have Convicted Trump for January 6
New York Sun
·RightThe underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.Mixed Reliable
The special counsel's report starkly illustrates the breadth of Donald Trump's efforts to undermine democracy, which would have warranted a conviction had he not achieved re-election.
Trump Fumes as Final Jack Smith Report Details 'Series of Criminal Efforts to Retain Power'
Common Dreams
·LeftThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
Trump’s vehement criticism of Jack Smith reveals his continuing belief in his innocence and a persistent refusal to acknowledge the severity of the allegations against him.
New York Post
·Leans RightThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The evidence against Trump is not only substantial but compelling enough to support a conviction, underscoring the extraordinary nature of his alleged attempts to subvert democracy.
DOJ Releases Jack Smith’s Report on Trump
Epoch Times
·RightThe underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.Mixed Reliable
The special counsel's report highlights a troubling reality: had Trump lost the 2020 election, he would likely have faced serious legal consequences for his actions to undermine democracy.
Special counsel says Trump would have been convicted over 2020 election | First Thing
The Guardian
·Leans LeftThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The release of the Justice Department's report signals a determined effort to hold Trump accountable for his actions surrounding the January 6 Capitol riot, despite his claims of political persecution.
Jack Smith in Jan. 6 report says Trump would have been convicted if he hadn't won in November
Axios
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The troubling implications of this report suggest that Trump, had he not emerged victorious in the 2024 election, could have faced serious legal consequences for his attempts to undermine democracy.
Trump escaped conviction for ‘criminal efforts to retain power’: Report
Al Jazeera
·Leans LeftThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The report from special counsel Jack Smith underscores the serious accusations against Donald Trump regarding the attempts to undermine the 2020 election, clearly indicating that the legal challenges are far from over despite his recent electoral victory.
Read the report: Special counsel Jack Smith says his office had evidence to convict Trump
USA TODAY
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
Jack Smith's report emphatically defends his prosecution of Donald Trump, rejecting the former president's claims of political bias and asserting that his decisions were firmly rooted in upholding the law.
Jack Smith denounces Trump in final report on Jan. 6 case - Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
·Leans RightThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The final report from Special Counsel Jack Smith starkly highlights the serious implications of Trump's actions, suggesting that his election may have shielded him from accountability for the insurrection.
Jack Smith's final report about January 6 is out. Read it here.
Business Insider
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
Special counsel Jack Smith's final report clearly indicates that Donald Trump's return to the presidency was a pivotal factor in averting his criminal prosecution, emphasizing the alarming nature of his attempts to subvert democracy.
Jack Smith, in final report, says voters saved Trump from being convicted in Jan. 6 case
ABC News
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The report serves as a sobering reminder of the challenges faced in defending democracy against a pattern of deceit and intimidation that characterized the former president's actions in the wake of his electoral defeat.
Jack Smith’s Report on Trump Released: Takeaways and Read in Full
TIME Magazine
·Leans LeftThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The recent report from Special Counsel Jack Smith underscores the legal challenges facing Donald Trump amid accusations of obstructing the electoral process and improperly handling classified documents, reflecting a critical moment in American political history.
U.S. Justice Department releases report on Trump attempt to overturn 2020 election
CNBC
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The release of Special Counsel Jack Smith's report not only reinforces the serious allegations against Trump but also highlights the enduring challenges faced by legal authorities in holding powerful figures accountable.
Jack Smith Report Released; Trump Fires Back Quickly
Newsmax
·RightThe underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.Mixed Reliable
The recent revelations from Special Counsel Jack Smith's report suggest a troubling narrative of deceit and obstruction tied to Trump, raising serious concerns about the integrity of democratic processes during his presidency.
Special counsel's final report on Trump investigation submitted to Congress
CBS News
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The Justice Department's handling of the charges against Trump showcases a precarious balance between legal accountability and the unique challenges posed by a sitting president's immunity, ultimately raising profound questions about the integrity of the justice system.
DOJ Releases Special Counsel Jack Smith's Findings In Trump Jan. 6 Probe
HuffPost
·Leans LeftThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The release of the report marks a pivotal moment in American history, underscoring the dire consequences of Trump’s actions that incited violence and distorted the truth surrounding the 2020 election.
Jack Smith pens biting defense of Jan. 6 probe, says jury would have convicted Trump
NBC News
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
Legal experts say Cannon didn’t have jurisdiction over the Jan 6 report anyway – or potentially even the classified documents report – but Monday’s ruling makes it easier for Garland to navigate the challenges to releasing the report on Trump’s election overturn attempts.
Jack Smith report into Trump and election subversion to be released after Judge Cannon's ruling
Salon
·LeftThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable
The Court is not willing to make that gamble on the basis of generalized interest by members of Congress, at least not without full briefing and a hearing on the subject.
BREAKING: Judge Cannon sets hearing on release of Jack Smith’s report in Trump classified docs case
The Post Millennial
·RightThe underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.Mixed Reliable
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, is latest back and forth in a court dispute over the report from the special counsel who prosecuted Trump in two cases the Justice Department abandoned in November.
Judge allows Justice Department to release special counsel Smith's report on Trump's Jan. 6 case
PBS NewsHour
·Leans LeftThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
Cannon denied an effort by President-elect Donald Trump’s former classified documents case co-defendants to block release of the report’s first volume, which covers Smith’s investigation relating to the 2020 election.
Judge Cannon Allows DOJ To Release Part Of Jack Smith’s Report In Trump Case
Daily Caller
·RightThe underlying sources have a mixed track record. They provide accurate information in some cases but are known to inject bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting. Read these stories cautiously and cross-check claims when possible.Mixed Reliable
The new order from the Trump-appointed judge is the latest twist in a court fight that has upended the Justice Department’s preparations for winding down its investigations into Trump before he is sworn into office next week, while jeopardizing the transparency Congress and the public have into those probes.
Judge Cannon OKs release of special counsel’s report into Trump and election subversion | Politics
CNN
·Leans LeftThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
The ruling, if it stands, could open the door for the public to learn additional details in the coming days about Trump’s frantic but ultimately failed effort to cling to power in the run-up to the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol.
Judge clears the way for release of special counsel Smith's report on Trump's 2020 election case
Associated Press
·CenterThe underlying sources consistently report facts with minimal bias. They demonstrate high-quality journalism and accuracy across multiple articles.Reliable
On his way out the door, Smith took one final swipe at Trump, submitting a two-volume report to Attorney General Merrick Garland detailing his investigations into the president-elect.
Special counsel Jack Smith resigns from DOJ — takes one final swipe at Trump
The Blaze
·RightThe underlying sources generally maintain reliability but have, at times, included opinion pieces, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies. While typically factual, there may be occasional editorialization or subjective interpretation.Mostly Reliable