North Carolina Supreme Court Halts Enforcement of Controversial Election Ruling
The NC Supreme Court has temporarily stayed a lower court's ruling affecting 65,000 votes in a contested Supreme Court election.
His ongoing challenge to North Carolinians’ choice has become its own lost cause, deeply rooted in the tradition of myths that have kept some people re-enacting the Civil War for 160 years.
Opinion | The Lost Cause factors into this North Carolina judge’s refusal to admit defeat
MSNBC·11d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.The stay, which was sought in part by Justice Allison Riggs — the Democratic incumbent in the race — is in place while the Supreme Court determines whether it wants to formally review the Court of Appeals decision and or decide if it was correct.
Court directive to locate voters in close North Carolina election blocked for now
Associated Press·11d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Even small changes to the vote count in the race could affect the outcome.
N.C. Supreme Court halts decision requiring verification of 65,000 votes in tight judicial race
NBC News·11d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Summary
The North Carolina Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a decision that would require the recount and verification of over 65,000 votes in a closely contested Supreme Court race. The stay prevents immediate action while the court reviews appeals related to allegations of illegal voting raised by Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin, who trails by 734 votes after recounts. The ongoing legal battle raises questions about voter eligibility and could impact the election outcome. Both candidates have recused themselves from parts of the case, and the matter may escalate to federal court if necessary.
Perspectives
The North Carolina Supreme Court has temporarily blocked the enforcement of a controversial Appeals Court ruling that favored Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin, who is contesting the election results of the closely contested Supreme Court race.
Griffin alleges that over 65,000 ballots should be challenged due to voters lacking proper identification, and the Appeals Court had mandated a process to check their eligibility, but the Supreme Court's stay puts that process on hold as they consider an appeal.
Both candidates have recused themselves from discussions in this case amidst the ongoing legal challenge, which could impact the future of voter eligibility in North Carolina. There's significant concern over potential voter disenfranchisement due to the challenged ballots.
FAQs
No FAQs available for this story.