What was the total number of job cuts across the US Agency for Global Media and Voice of America under the Trump administration?

The Trump administration cut a total of 1,400 jobs across the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and Voice of America (VOA), including 639 job losses specifically at VOA.

What percentage of jobs were eliminated at the US Agency for Global Media in this restructuring?

Approximately 85% of jobs at the US Agency for Global Media were eliminated, leaving only about 250 employees.

What reasons did the Trump administration give for these significant layoffs in federal media organizations?

The Trump administration stated the layoffs were to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies and unnecessary spending, aiming to streamline operations and prioritize taxpayers’ interests.

How did the layoffs affect the Persian-language service of Voice of America?

Employees from the Persian-language service of Voice of America were among those who received termination notices as part of the layoffs.

What changes in agency priorities accompanied these job cuts at Voice of America and USAGM?

Under Kari Lake's leadership, the agency emphasized shifting priorities, including ending a $250 million luxury lease as part of broader cost-cutting and operational restructuring efforts.

9 sources

•

6M ago

Trump Administration Cuts Jobs at Voice of America and USAGM

The Trump administration has eliminated 1,400 positions, including 639 at Voice of America, as part of a strategy to streamline federal media operations.

L 33%

C 33%

R 33%

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

The Trump administration has terminated 639 employees at Voice of America, contributing to a total of 1,400 job losses across media outlets.

85% of jobs have been eliminated at the US Agency for Global Media, leaving only 250 employees remaining.

These layoffs are part of a broader strategy to dismantle perceived bureaucratic inefficiencies within U.S.-funded broadcasters.

Kari Lake's leadership has emphasized a shift in agency priorities, including the termination of a $250 million luxury lease.

The executive orders signed by Trump target bloated bureaucracy, significantly reducing staff and operations across federal media organizations.

Written using shared reports from

9 sources

Report issue

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources frame the layoffs at Voice of America as a significant and detrimental action by the Trump administration, highlighting the impact on employees and the agency's mission. The tone reflects concern over the dismantling of a key media outlet, suggesting a bias against the administration's decisions and policies.

How we categorize media bias

Sources (9)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Sort By

Center (3)

Layoff notices delivered to hundreds of Voice of America employees

Associated Press•6M ago

Voice of America gutted by Trump adviser Kari Lake

NPR•6M ago

Trump Administration Eliminates Most Staff Of Voice Of America, Other U.S.-Funded Broadcasters

Deadline•6M ago

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

: The Trump administration cut a total of 1,400 jobs across the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and Voice of America (VOA), including 639 job losses specifically at VOA.
Sources:
Economic Times
: Approximately 85% of jobs at the US Agency for Global Media were eliminated, leaving only about 250 employees.
Sources:
Economic Times
: The Trump administration stated the layoffs were to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies and unnecessary spending, aiming to streamline operations and prioritize taxpayers’ interests.
Sources:
Economic Times
: Employees from the Persian-language service of Voice of America were among those who received termination notices as part of the layoffs.
Sources:
Economic Times
: Under Kari Lake's leadership, the agency emphasized shifting priorities, including ending a $250 million luxury lease as part of broader cost-cutting and operational restructuring efforts.
Sources:
Economic Times

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

This story does not have any previous versions.