Jury Deliberates in Misdemeanor Assault Trial of Former DOJ Employee Over Sandwich-Throwing Protest

A jury is deliberating the misdemeanor assault trial of Sean Charles Dunn, a former DOJ employee, accused of throwing a sandwich at a federal agent.

L 36%
C 55%
R 9%

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

1.

Former Justice Department employee Sean Charles Dunn is on trial for misdemeanor assault, accused of throwing a sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent in Washington, D.C.

2.

Dunn's action, captured in a viral video, occurred during a protest against President Trump's law-enforcement surge, where he called agents 'fascists' and 'racists'.

3.

Initially facing felony assault charges, a grand jury refused to indict Dunn, leading to the current misdemeanor charge brought by the U.S. Attorney's office.

4.

During the two-day trial, Dunn did not testify, while his lawyer argued for acquittal, asserting the act was political speech and not a crime.

5.

The jury is now deliberating Dunn's fate, following his rearrest by armed federal agents after an initial release, making him a symbol of resistance.

Written using shared reports from
11 sources
.
Report issue

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally by presenting a balanced account of the legal proceedings and surrounding context. They avoid loaded language and ensure both prosecution and defense arguments are clearly articulated, allowing readers to form their own conclusions. The reporting focuses on factual developments and attributed statements.

Sources (11)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

A grand jury initially refused to indict Dunn on the more serious felony assault charge, which prompted the U.S. Attorney’s office to proceed with a misdemeanor assault charge instead.

The viral video captured Dunn throwing a sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent during a protest, which became a key piece of evidence in the case and contributed to the public notoriety of the incident.

Dunn’s lawyer contended that throwing the sandwich was an act of political protest, reflecting dissent against President Trump’s law-enforcement surge, and thus protected by free speech rights rather than constituting criminal assault.

Dunn was rearrested by armed federal agents after his initial release; this enforcement action intensified media attention and cast him as a symbol of resistance against aggressive government prosecution.

The protest was directed against President Trump’s deployment of additional law enforcement to Washington, D.C., with Dunn and other demonstrators criticizing agents as 'fascists' and 'racists'.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

This story does not have any previous versions.