Pritzker Demands $8.6 Billion After Supreme Court Strikes Down Tariffs
After a 6-3 Supreme Court ruling that tariffs exceeded IEEPA authority, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker demanded $1,700 per household, totaling $8,679,261,600.
Overview
The U.S. Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision struck down tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker said the tariffs "wreaked havoc on farmers, enraged our allies, and sent grocery prices through the roof."
Pritzker demanded a $1,700 refund for every Illinois household, attaching an invoice for 5,105,448 households totaling $8,679,261,600.
Reporting said the administration collected roughly $175 billion in tariffs before the Supreme Court ruling.
The Supreme Court ruling did not order refunds, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said resolution could be litigated for weeks, months or years.
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame Pritzker’s demand as a politically charged publicity move, highlighting his campaign publicity, billionaire status, and 2028 speculation while foregrounding emotive language (e.g., "wreaked havoc," "sent grocery prices through the roof"). Editorial choices prioritize political context and Pritzker’s perspective over detailed examination of tariff effects or dissenting viewpoints.
Sources (4)
FAQ
The Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the president to impose tariffs, as tariff imposition is a congressional taxing power, IEEPA does not mention 'tariffs,' and no prior president used it for that purpose.
The tariffs collected roughly $175 billion, but the Supreme Court ruling did not order refunds; importers may pursue claims, though the process could take weeks, months, or years.
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker demands $1,700 per household, totaling $8.679 billion for 5,105,448 households, claiming the tariffs harmed farmers, allies, and raised grocery prices.
The administration will stop collecting IEEPA tariffs, maintain Section 232 and 301 tariffs, and impose a new 10% global tariff under Section 122, expecting similar revenue.
Yes, using statutes like Section 122 (up to 15% for 150 days), Section 232 (national security), and Section 301 (unfair practices), which are more constrained but allow continuation.
History
This story does not have any previous versions.