Australia Deactivates 4.7 Million Under-16 Social Media Accounts After Age Ban
Ten major platforms reported deactivating about 4.7 million accounts identified as Australian users under 16 after a December law imposing fines and age-verification requirements nationwide.
Overview
Australia's government said ten platforms removed or restricted roughly 4.7 million accounts of users believed under 16 in the month after the December ban took effect.
The law requires platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, Snapchat and YouTube to verify ages or face fines up to A$49.5 million for noncompliance.
Platforms can verify age via ID checks, third-party biometric age estimation, or inference from account data such as account age; messaging apps like WhatsApp remain exempt.
Officials and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hailed the outcome; parents and child-safety advocates largely approved while privacy campaigners and some teenagers warned of lost support spaces.
Regulators noted spikes in downloads of alternative apps but not in sustained usage; they plan continued enforcement and new AI companion and chatbot restrictions to limit circumvention.
Analysis
Center-leaning sources present this reporting as neutral: they emphasize child-safety rationales and regulatory details while noting industry pushback and privacy concerns. Coverage highlights official data and quotes from ministers and regulators, balances proponents (parents, child‑safety groups) with opponents (privacy advocates, teens), and avoids loaded editorial language or selective omission.
Sources (4)
FAQ
The platforms include Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, Snapchat, YouTube, Kick, Reddit, and Threads.
Platforms can use ID checks, third-party biometric age estimation such as facial scans or selfies, inference from account data, or bank verification like ConnectID.
Noncompliant platforms face fines up to A$49.5 million.
No, there are no penalties for children under 16 who gain access or for their parents or carers.
Officials and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hailed the outcome; parents and child-safety advocates approved, while privacy campaigners and some teenagers warned of lost support spaces.
History
This story does not have any previous versions.




