New here? See how Pano works →

All editions

Thursday, September 24th

The Pano newsletter, as it was sent that morning.

Daily Pano-rama

A recap of the day's most covered stories
  1. 125articles
  2. 224articles
  3. 323articles
  4. 417articles
  5. 515articles
  6. 612articles
  7. 711articles
  8. 810articles
  9. 910articles
  10. 1010articles

Also today: Meta Debuts Muse Wearables · OpenAI, Anthropic Urge UN Rules · Susan Collins Denies Probe Report · FBI Probes Jobs Portal Breach · Paramount Eyes Elon Musk Investment

In depth

The biggest stories, and how each side covered them

U.S. Walks Out On Iran

U.S. and Israeli delegates left the U.N. as Iran’s president delivered a defiant speech. · 25 articles

36% left · 28% center · 36% right

What happened

The U.S. delegation walked out as Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian addressed the U.N. General Assembly. Israel’s delegation boycotted the speech. The confrontation followed President Trump’s warning a day earlier that he was weighing whether to “annihilate” Iran if no deal was reached. It was an unusual moment because Pezeshkian led a country actively at war with the United States and Israel. Pezeshkian accused both governments of illegal attacks on Iranian civilians and infrastructure. He held up photos of children he said were killed, while U.S. officials have rejected Iran’s account. He said Iran would resist pressure but remained open to diplomacy. More sideline talks are expected soon.

From the left

Left-leaning accounts framed the speech as Iran’s attempt to turn Trump’s terrorism charge back on Washington and Israel. The Guardian highlighted Pezeshkian’s claim that the United States was the region’s real bully, while also noting his willingness to talk. Raw Story lingered on the walkout as he displayed images of slain children.

From the right

Right-leaning accounts framed the speech as Iran casting itself as a victim while sidestepping its own record on terrorism and proxies. The New York Post stressed that Pezeshkian’s government backs terror groups across the region. Fox News emphasized his anti-Trump defiance and the hostile reception from protesters and dissidents in New York.

Read the full story →

Harvey Weinstein Gets 15 Years

The former Hollywood producer received a 15-year term in a New York sexual assault case. · 24 articles

38% left · 46% center · 17% right

What happened

Harvey Weinstein was sentenced in Manhattan to 15 years in prison for sexually assaulting former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006. The sentence followed a 2024 reversal of his original New York conviction and a 2025 retrial that again found him guilty of a first-degree criminal sexual act against Haley. Weinstein has already served more than six years while the case moved through appeals, retrials and mistrials. Haley told the court the assault and backlash felt like a “life sentence.” Weinstein apologized to people he may have hurt, but denied the allegations. Judge Curtis Farber called him a sexual predator. Weinstein remains separately imprisoned on California convictions.

From the left

Left-leaning coverage cast the sentence as the endpoint of a turbulent legal odyssey after Weinstein’s overturned conviction and retrial. Al Jazeera said the ruling “seals six years of legal battles,” while CNN also framed it as a renewed #MeToo reckoning and the latest chapter in the fall of a disgraced Hollywood power broker. The Guardian centered Haley’s account of lasting harm, including the “harassment and humiliation” she said she endured after coming forward.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets led with long-delayed accountability, casting Weinstein as a disgraced Hollywood mogul and #MeToo-era sexual predator. The Gateway Pundit focused on the procedural maze, calling the New York trial history a “convoluted legal drama”. The Daily Caller lingered on prosecutors’ claims that Weinstein sought to smear victims and witnesses.

Read the full story →

U.S.-Iran UN Talks Resume

Washington and Tehran held mediated UN talks as Trump paired threats with diplomacy. · 17 articles

24% left · 53% center · 24% right

What happened

U.S. and Iranian officials resumed indirect talks on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly, their first such contacts since June. Mediators, including Qatar, carried messages between the two sides as President Trump threatened to make a deal with Iran or “annihilate” the Islamic Republic. The talks come during a nearly seven-month war that has disrupted the Strait of Hormuz, keeping shipping below prewar levels and adding pressure to oil markets. Trump said the meeting went “very well” and that another round was scheduled soon. Iran said it used the meeting to press for an end to U.S. aggression, sanctions pressure and frozen assets. A senior Iranian official said Tehran could reopen the strait within days if Washington eases military pressure.

From the left

Left-leaning accounts treated the session as a narrow diplomatic opening, while stressing how fragile it looked under military threat. Al Jazeera emphasized mediator-led, indirect talks as the key sign of renewed contact. The Guardian lingered on Trump’s coercive style, describing his threat language as the kind of bombast he uses during Iran talks. It also highlighted Iran’s refusal to look like it was conceding before pressure eased.

From the right

Right-leaning accounts cast Trump as forcing a hard choice, with diplomacy gaining strength because of pressure. CBN led with Trump’s deal-or-destruction framing, presenting him as setting the terms for Tehran. Breitbart focused on new momentum toward an agreement, using Trump’s upbeat read of the session as the main signal. Liberty Nation framed Trump as the actor confronting dangers that other countries had let grow.

Read the full story →

Every side, every morning

The day’s biggest stories and how the left and right covered them. Free, in your inbox.

You're reading the web version of the Pano newsletter sent Thursday, September 24th. Browse all editions