15

Articles

14

Sources

33%

Analysis & opinion

The reporting

A neutral summary of the key facts most outlets agree on, drawn from reporting across the political spectrum.

Testimony ended Wednesday in Lindsay Clancy’s Massachusetts murder trial after 85 witnesses, and closing arguments are set for Thursday. The final witness, prosecution forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, testified that Clancy could understand right from wrong, control her behavior and was not acting on a command hallucination when her three children were killed. Clancy, 36, has pleaded not guilty to three first-degree murder counts in the January 2023 strangulation deaths of her children in Duxbury. The judge said jurors may consider manslaughter but not alleged police errors.

Analysis & opinion

The arguments that emerged from this coverage — built only from the analysis and opinion pieces, never from straight reporting. Each dot is one article, placed by its outlet's bias — left to right. How to read our graphics →
angles sorted left-argued → right-argued
·

Misplaced sympathyLeans Right

Public sympathy for Lindsay Clancy is morally indefensible because she admitted killing her children. Treating her as a relatable victim or role model wrongly excuses an act that should not be softened by appeals to empathy.

The Federalist
Hot Air
The Post Millennial

Get tomorrow's edition

Every side, every morning — free in your inbox.

More of today's stories

all of today's stories →