Cornell Accepts Rape Review

Cornell faces outside scrutiny over its response to an alleged gang rape case.

Left & Center

4 left4 center2 right

Updated 6:00am ET

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

What happened

Cornell agreed to an independent outside review of its response to sexual assault allegations involving a former student identified as Jane Doe. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said the review will examine the university’s handling of the case after she urged Cornell to accept outside counsel. Doe says she was gang raped by seven Chi Phi fraternity members in October 2024 after consensual activity became nonconsensual. In a sworn interview, she said she was “100 percent confident” she was raped. District Attorney Matthew Van Houten initially declined charges, saying her statement described voluntary, conscious and consensual conduct. He has now reopened the case and plans to present it to a grand jury.

How each side covered it

From the left

Left-leaning accounts framed the case as an alleged fraternity gang rape and a test of whether institutions minimized Doe’s clearest allegation. The New York Times emphasized that an encounter described as initially consensual later became a prolonged drug-fueled attack. CNN pointed to a voluntary-intoxication loophole that can make cases harder to prosecute.

From the right

Right-leaning accounts framed the case around doubt, due process and the risk of a public rush to punish the accused. The New York Post cast the backlash as a “lynch mob” against the accused fraternity men. The Daily Mail emphasized transcript evidence that Doe said she was “100 percent confident” she was raped.

Headlines

  1. 195articles
  2. 239articles
  3. 334articles
  4. 434articles
  5. 533articles
  6. 631articles