17

Articles

16

Sources

88%

Analysis & opinion

The reporting

A neutral summary of the key facts most outlets agree on, drawn from reporting across the political spectrum.

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 emergency order, lifted a June injunction from a Massachusetts judge that had blocked President Trump from implementing parts of a March executive order restricting mail-in voting before the Nov. 3 midterms. The order lets the administration continue work on rules involving state voter-eligibility lists, citizenship checks and U.S. Postal Service handling of mailed ballots. A separate nationwide injunction against USPS implementation remains in place, so election procedures do not change immediately. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, saying the ruling leaves states scrambling.

Analysis & opinion

The arguments that emerged from this coverage — built only from the analysis and opinion pieces, never from straight reporting. Each dot is one article, placed by its outlet's bias — left to right. How to read our graphics →
angles sorted left-argued → right-argued
·

Pro-Trump courtLeans Left

The current Supreme Court is increasingly willing to intervene in election disputes in ways that benefit Trump. Its handling of the mail-in voting fight shows the Court helping Trump advance an anti-voting-rights agenda.

Slate

Voting access threatLeans Left

Trump’s mail-in voting order and the Supreme Court’s willingness to let it proceed threaten voting access and election administration. The plan is legally suspect, risks chaos in the midterms, and could disenfranchise eligible voters.

HuffPost
The Guardian
Wall Street Journal
Wired
ABC News

Get tomorrow's edition

Every side, every morning — free in your inbox.

More of today's stories

all of today's stories →